Results of a Digital Multimodal Motivational and Educational Program as Follow-Up Care for Former Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Abstract BackgroundDigital interventions are promising additions for both usual care and rehabilitation. Evidence and studies for the latter, however, are still rare. ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to examine the app/web-based patient education program called “mebix” (previously called “Vision 2 – Gesundes Herz”) regarding its effectiveness in relation to the parameters of disease-specific quality of life (HeartQoL), cardiovascular risk profile (Cardiovascular Risk Management [CARRISMA]), and prognostic estimation of early retirement (Screening instrument work and occupation [SIBAR]) in 190 participants from a cardiological rehabilitation clinic. MethodsTo evaluate mebix, 354 patients from the Roderbirken Clinic of the German Pension Insurance Rhineland (Germany) with a coronary heart diesase were recruited and randomized either to the intervention group (using mebix postrehabiliation for up to 12 months) or the control group (receiving standard care). The data collection took place at the end of inpatient rehabilitation (t0), as well as 6 months (t1) and 12 months (t2) after the end of rehabilitation. Analyses of variance are used to assess the overall significance of difference in outcome parameters between groups and over time. ResultsThe primary endpoint of disease-related quality of life shows a significant improvement of 7.35 points over the course of the intervention that is also more pronounced in the intervention group. Similarly, the 10-year risk of cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction showed significant improvements in the cardiovascular risk profile over time and between groups, indicating better results in the intervention group (ie, a reduction of −1.59 and −5.03, respectively). Positive effects on secondary outcomes like body weight, blood pressure, and number of smokers only showed time effects, indicating no difference between the groups. In addition, the SIBAR was significantly lower/better at the end of the observation period than at the beginning of the observation for both groups. ConclusionsOverall, the digital training program represents an effective follow-up offer after rehabilitation that could be incorporated into standard care to further improve disease-related quality of life and cardiovascular risk profiles.