Reduction of the Economic Risk by Adaptation Measures to Alleviate Heat Stress in Confined Buildings for Growing-Fattening Pigs Modelled by a Projection for Central Europe in 2030
Günther Schauberger,
Martin Schönhart,
Werner Zollitsch,
Stefan J. Hörtenhuber,
Leopold Kirner,
Christian Mikovits,
Johannes Baumgartner,
Martin Piringer,
Werner Knauder,
Ivonne Anders,
Konrad Andre,
Isabel Hennig-Pauka
Affiliations
Günther Schauberger
WG Environmental Health, Unit for Physiology and Biophysics, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria
Martin Schönhart
Institute for Sustainable Economic Development, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1180 Vienna, Austria
Werner Zollitsch
Division of Livestock Sciences, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1180 Vienna, Austria
Stefan J. Hörtenhuber
Division of Livestock Sciences, Department of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, 1180 Vienna, Austria
Leopold Kirner
University College for Agrarian and Environmental Pedagogy, 1130 Vienna, Austria
Christian Mikovits
WG Environmental Health, Unit for Physiology and Biophysics, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria
Johannes Baumgartner
Institute of Animal Welfare Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria
Martin Piringer
Department of Environmental Meteorology, Central Institute of Meteorology and Geodynamics, 1190 Vienna, Austria
Werner Knauder
Department of Environmental Meteorology, Central Institute of Meteorology and Geodynamics, 1190 Vienna, Austria
Ivonne Anders
German Climate Computing Centre DKRZ, 20416 Hamburg, Germany
Konrad Andre
Department for Climatology, Central Institute of Meteorology and Geodynamics, 1190 Vienna, Austria
Isabel Hennig-Pauka
Field Station for Epidemiology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 49456 Bakum, Germany
Economic risks for livestock production are caused by volatile commodities and market conditions, but also by environmental drivers such as increasing uncertainties due to weather anomalies and global warming. These risks impact the gross margin of farmers and can stimulate investment decisions. For confined pig and poultry production, farmers can reduce the environmental impact by implementing specific adaptation measures (AMs) to reduce heat stress. A simulation model driven by meteorological data was used to calculate indoor climate for 1981 to 2017. This dataset was extrapolated for a projection in the year 2030. The heat stress was calculated for a business-as-usual livestock building and for several AMs. For 2030, the expected value of the reduction of the gross margin was calculated by EUR 3.98 a−1 per animal place for the business-as-usual scenario. The results show that only energy-saving adaptation measures to reduce the inlet air temperature are appropriate to reduce the economic risk to the level of the year 1980 between EUR 0.03 a−1 and EUR 1.02 a−1 per animal place. The efficiency of other AMs to reduce heat stress is distinctly lower (between EUR 2.62 a−1 and EUR 3.80 a−1 per animal place). The results in this study can support the decision making of farmers concerning adaptation management and investments. It can inform agricultural policy design as well as technological development.