Liver Cancer (Jan 2021)

Clinical-Radiomic Analysis for Pretreatment Prediction of Objective Response to First Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • Mingyu Chen,
  • Jiasheng Cao,
  • Jiahao Hu,
  • Win Topatana,
  • Shijie Li,
  • Sarun Juengpanich,
  • Jian Lin,
  • Chenhao Tong,
  • Jiliang Shen,
  • Bin Zhang,
  • Jennifer Wu,
  • Christine Pocha,
  • Masatoshi Kudo,
  • Amedeo Amedei,
  • Franco Trevisani,
  • Pil Soo Sung,
  • Victor M. Zaydfudim,
  • Tatsuo Kanda,
  • Xiujun Cai

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1159/000512028
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 1
pp. 38 – 51

Abstract

Read online

Background: The preoperative selection of patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are likely to have an objective response to first transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains challenging. Objective: To develop and validate a clinical-radiomic model (CR model) for preoperatively predicting treatment response to first TACE in patients with intermediate-stage HCC. Methods: A total of 595 patients with intermediate-stage HCC were included in this retrospective study. A tumoral and peritumoral (10 mm) radiomic signature (TPR-signature) was constructed based on 3,404 radiomic features from 4 regions of interest. A predictive CR model based on TPR-signature and clinical factors was developed using multivariate logistic regression. Calibration curves and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were used to evaluate the model’s performance. Results: The final CR model consisted of 5 independent predictors, including TPR-signature (p < 0.001), AFP (p = 0.004), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer System Stage B (BCLC B) subclassification (p = 0.01), tumor location (p = 0.039), and arterial hyperenhancement (p = 0.050). The internal and external validation results demonstrated the high-performance level of this model, with internal and external AUCs of 0.94 and 0.90, respectively. In addition, the predicted objective response via the CR model was associated with improved survival in the external validation cohort (hazard ratio: 2.43; 95% confidence interval: 1.60–3.69; p < 0.001). The predicted treatment response also allowed for significant discrimination between the Kaplan-Meier curves of each BCLC B subclassification. Conclusions: The CR model had an excellent performance in predicting the first TACE response in patients with intermediate-stage HCC and could provide a robust predictive tool to assist with the selection of patients for TACE.

Keywords