Armaghane Danesh Bimonthly Journal (Nov 2019)
Evaluation of Fibroblast Cell Proliferation Assay on Polycaprolactone-Chitosan-Tannic Acid Scaffold
Abstract
Abstract Background & aim: Tissue engineering identifies degraded tissue components and provides rational solutions to improve and perform them. One of these approaches is to fabricate a mixed scaffold with polysaccharide and synthetic antioxidants for stem cells to be cultured inside. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potency of poly caprolactan-chitosan-tannic acid scaffold for proliferation of fibroblast cells. Methods: In the present experimental study, polycaprolactane, chitosan powder and tannic acid scaffold were prepared for growth of fibroblast cells. Subsequently, the following groups were designed: Group 1: Polycaprolactane scaffold Group 2: Polycaprolactane-chitosan scaffold Group 3: Polycaprolactane-tannic acid scaffold Group 4: Polycaprolactane-chitosan-tannic acid scaffold. The human foreskin was prepared and the dermal layer fibroblast cells were isolated after laboratory tests, then the cells were placed in cell culture flasks with DMEM medium and stored in a 5% CO2 incubator. Ten thousand cell fibroblasts were transferred to 96-well wells containing DMEM solution and scaffolds and then fibroblast cell proliferation and viability were determined by MTT assay and by SEM microscopy to determine the infiltration of fibroblast cells into scaffolds and also in order to review of the chemical groups in the polymers was performed using a FTIR spectrometer. The results were analyzed by the SPSS software; ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test after the data were analyzed uniformly. Results: The mean survival rate of fibroblast cells based on MTT assay at 24 h was significantly increased in the polycaprolactone-tannic acid scaffold group (p<0.05) compared to the polycaprolactone scaffold group (p<0.05). The results also indicated that the mean survival of cells based on MTT assay at 24 h was significantly increased in the polycaprolactone-chitosan-tannic acid scaffold group (p<0.05) compared to the polycaprolactone scaffold group (p<0.05). Moreover, the mean cell viability in the polyprolactone-chitosan scaffold was not statistically significant compared to the polyprolactone group. Conclusion: Due to its hydrophilic properties and biocompatibility of chitosan and tannic acid, poly caprolactone-chitosan-tannic acid scaffold may be a suitable scaffold for the activity of fibroblast cells in the scaffold. It can also be a good environment for the growth and proliferation of other cells.