Indian Journal of Psychiatry (Jul 2024)

Dual diagnosis and their care pathways for help-seeking: A multicenter study from India

  • Abhishek Ghosh,
  • Diptadhi Mukherjee,
  • Sourav Khanra,
  • Sambhu Prasad,
  • Tathagata Mahintamani,
  • Aniruddha Basu,
  • Susanta Padhy,
  • Navratan Suthar,
  • Aditya Somani,
  • Sidharth Arya,
  • Basudeb Das,
  • Pankaj Kumar,
  • Kumari Rina,
  • Hoineiting Rebecca Haokip,
  • Aparajita Guin,
  • Shree Mishra,
  • Naresh Nebhinani,
  • Lokesh K. Singh,
  • Rajiv Gupta,
  • Ramandeep Kaur,
  • Debasish Basu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_79_24
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 66, no. 7
pp. 630 – 640

Abstract

Read online

Background: Understanding pathways to dual diagnosis (DD) care will help organize DD services and facilitate training and referral across healthcare sectors. Aim: The aim of our study was to characterize the stepwise healthcare and other contacts among patients with DD, compare the characteristics of the first contact persons with common mental disorder (CMD) versus severe mental illness (SMI), and estimate the likelihood of receiving appropriate DD treatment across levels of contacts. Methods: This cross-sectional, descriptive study in eight Indian centers included newly enrolled patients with DD between April 2022 and February 2023. The research spans varied geographic regions, tapping into regional variations in disease burden, health practices, and demographics. The study categorized healthcare contacts by using the WHO Pathways Encounter Form. Results: The sample (n = 589) had a median age of 32 years, mostly males (96%). Alcohol was the most common substance; SMI (50.8%) and CMD were equally represented. Traditional healers were a common first contact choice (18.5%); however, integrated DD care dominated subsequent contacts. Assistance likelihood increased from the first to the second contact (23.1% to 62.1%) but declined in subsequent contacts, except for a significant rise in the fifth contact (97.4%). In the initial contact, patients with CMD sought help from public-general hospitals and private practitioners for SUD symptoms; individuals with SMI leaned on relatives and sought out traditional healers for psychiatric symptoms. Conclusion: Recognizing the cultural nuances, advocating for integrated care, and addressing systemic challenges pave the way to bridge the gap in DD treatment.

Keywords