Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine (Mar 2022)

Analysis of the accuracy of automatic electrocardiogram interpretation in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

  • Seongsoo Kim,
  • Wonhee Kim,
  • Gu Hyun Kang,
  • Yong Soo Jang,
  • Hyun Young Choi,
  • Jae Guk Kim,
  • Yoonje Lee,
  • Dong Geum Shin

DOI
https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.21.163
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 1
pp. 18 – 23

Abstract

Read online

Objective This study aimed to analyze the association between the culprit artery and the diagnostic accuracy of automatic electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods This single-centered, retrospective cohort study included adult patients with STEMI who visited the emergency department between January 2017 and December 2020. The primary endpoint was the association between the culprit artery occlusion and the misinterpretation of ECG, evaluated by the chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Results The rate of misinterpretation of the automated ECG for patients with STEMI was 26.5% (31/117 patients). There was no significant correlation between the ST segment change in the four involved leads (anteroseptal, lateral, inferior, and aVR) and the misinterpretation of ECG (all P > 0.05). Single culprit artery occlusion significantly affected the misinterpretation of ECG compared with multiple culprit artery occlusion (single vs. multiple, 27/86 [31.3%] vs. 4/31 [12.9%], P = 0.045). There was no association between culprit artery and the misinterpretation of ECG (P = 0.132). Conclusion Single culprit artery occlusion might increase misinterpretation of ECG compared with multiple culprit artery occlusions in the automatic interpretation of STEMI.

Keywords