Surgeries (Jun 2024)

Evaluating the Quality and Safety of In-Office Rhinologic Procedures: A YO-IFOS Pilot Study

  • David Lobo,
  • Christian Calvo,
  • Juan Maza-Solano,
  • Leigh Sowerby,
  • Luca Giovanni Locatello,
  • Alberto Maria Saibene,
  • Carlos Chiesa-Estomba,
  • Osama Metwaly,
  • Karol Zelenik,
  • Manuel Tucciarone,
  • Alkis Psaltis,
  • Raghu Nandhan,
  • Jerome R. Lechien,
  • Antonino Maniaci,
  • Jaime Viera-Artiles,
  • Isam Alobid

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5020039
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 5, no. 2
pp. 476 – 485

Abstract

Read online

The primary objective of this pilot study was to identify which aspects of in-office rhinologic procedures (IORPs) warrant further attention and investigation in the future. The secondary objectives were to survey which IORPs are most common and to identify needs for education and training. A cross-sectional study was carried out following the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS). The survey collected demographic, organizational, quality, and safety aspects of IORPs and was electronically distributed to YO-IFOS members across five continents. A total of 194 surgeons completed the survey, and 172 respondents (88%) performed IORPs. Ninety-nine responders (51.5%) worked in an academic setting. Common procedures included powered polypectomy (48, 28.4%) and turbinate reduction (93, 54.1%). The main concerns were about patients’ tolerance (116, 76.3%) and about the safety of the procedure (102, 67.1%). The most important barriers to the diffusion of IORPs are concerns about the tolerance and safety of these procedures. It would be convenient to establish protocols for this type of procedure to ensure the greatest patient comfort based on evidence.

Keywords