General Psychiatry (Sep 2018)

Tests for paired count outcomes

  • Bokai Wang,
  • Xin M Tu,
  • Tuo Lin,
  • James A Proudfoot

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2018-100004
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 31, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

For moderate to large sample sizes, all tests yielded pvalues close to the nominal, except when models were misspecified. The signed-rank test generally had the lowest power. Within the current context of count outcomes, the signed-rank test shows subpar power when compared with tests that are contrasted based on full data, such as the GEE. Parametric models for count outcomes such as the GLMM with a Poisson for marginal count outcomes are quite sensitive to departures from assumed parametric models. There is some small bias for all the asymptotic tests, that is,the signed-ranktest, GLMM and GEE, especially for small sample sizes. Resampling methods such as permutation can help alleviate this.