Frontiers in Oncology (Oct 2021)

First-In-Human Study in Cancer Patients Establishing the Feasibility of Oxygen Measurements in Tumors Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance With the OxyChip

  • Philip E. Schaner,
  • Benjamin B. Williams,
  • Benjamin B. Williams,
  • Eunice Y. Chen,
  • Jason R. Pettus,
  • Wilson A. Schreiber,
  • Maciej M. Kmiec,
  • Lesley A. Jarvis,
  • David A. Pastel,
  • Rebecca A. Zuurbier,
  • Roberta M. DiFlorio-Alexander,
  • Joseph A. Paydarfar,
  • Benoit J. Gosselin,
  • Richard J. Barth,
  • Kari M. Rosenkranz,
  • Sergey V. Petryakov,
  • Huagang Hou,
  • Dan Tse,
  • Alexandre Pletnev,
  • Ann Barry Flood,
  • Victoria A. Wood,
  • Kendra A. Hebert,
  • Robyn E. Mosher,
  • Eugene Demidenko,
  • Harold M. Swartz,
  • Periannan Kuppusamy,
  • Periannan Kuppusamy,
  • Periannan Kuppusamy

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.743256
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

ObjectiveThe overall objective of this clinical study was to validate an implantable oxygen sensor, called the ‘OxyChip’, as a clinically feasible technology that would allow individualized tumor-oxygen assessments in cancer patients prior to and during hypoxia-modification interventions such as hyperoxygen breathing.MethodsPatients with any solid tumor at ≤3-cm depth from the skin-surface scheduled to undergo surgical resection (with or without neoadjuvant therapy) were considered eligible for the study. The OxyChip was implanted in the tumor and subsequently removed during standard-of-care surgery. Partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) at the implant location was assessed using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) oximetry.ResultsTwenty-three cancer patients underwent OxyChip implantation in their tumors. Six patients received neoadjuvant therapy while the OxyChip was implanted. Median implant duration was 30 days (range 4–128 days). Forty-five successful oxygen measurements were made in 15 patients. Baseline pO2 values were variable with overall median 15.7 mmHg (range 0.6–73.1 mmHg); 33% of the values were below 10 mmHg. After hyperoxygenation, the overall median pO2 was 31.8 mmHg (range 1.5–144.6 mmHg). In 83% of the measurements, there was a statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) response to hyperoxygenation.ConclusionsMeasurement of baseline pO2 and response to hyperoxygenation using EPR oximetry with the OxyChip is clinically feasible in a variety of tumor types. Tumor oxygen at baseline differed significantly among patients. Although most tumors responded to a hyperoxygenation intervention, some were non-responders. These data demonstrated the need for individualized assessment of tumor oxygenation in the context of planned hyperoxygenation interventions to optimize clinical outcomes.

Keywords