PLoS ONE (Jan 2019)

Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting: Effect on periprocedural and long-term outcomes.

  • Jihoon Kang,
  • Jeong-Ho Hong,
  • Beom Joon Kim,
  • Hee-Joon Bae,
  • O-Ki Kwon,
  • Chang Wan Oh,
  • Cheolkyu Jung,
  • Ji Sung Lee,
  • Moon-Ku Han

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216592
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 9
p. e0216592

Abstract

Read online

OBJECTIVE:This study investigated the effect of residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting (CAS) on periprocedural and long-term outcomes. METHODS:Patients treated with CAS for symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid arterial stenosis were consecutively enrolled. Residual stenosis was estimated from post-procedure angiography findings. The effects of residual stenosis on 30-day periprocedural outcome and times to restenosis and clinical outcome were analyzed using logistic regression models and Wei-Lin-Weissfeld models, respectively. RESULTS:A total of 412 patients (age, 64.7 ± 17.0 years; male, 82.0%) were enrolled. The median baseline stenosis was 80% (interquartile range [IQR], 70-90%), which improved to 10% (0-30%) for residual stenosis. Residual stenosis was significantly associated with periprocedural outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 0.983; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.965-0.999, P = 0.01) after adjustment for baseline stenosis, age, hypertension, symptomaticity, and statin use. Over the 5-year observation period, residual stenosis did not increase the global hazard for restenosis and clinical outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.011; 95% CI, 0.997-1.025. In the event-specific model, residual stenosis increased the hazard for restenosis (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.041; 1.012-1.072) but not for clinical outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.011; 0.997-1.025). CONCLUSIONS:Residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting may be useful to predict periprocedural outcome and restenosis.