Comparing predictive performance of pulmonary embolism risk stratification tools for acute clinical deterioration

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Existing pulmonary embolism (PE) risk scores were developed to predict death within weeks, but not more proximate adverse events. We determined the ability of 3 PE risk stratification tools (simplified pulmonary embolism severity index [sPESI], 2019 European Society of Cardiology guidelines [ESC], and PE short‐term clinical outcomes risk estimation [PE‐SCORE]) to predict 5‐day clinical deterioration after emergency department (ED) diagnosis of PE. Methods We analyzed data from six EDs on ED patients with confirmed PE. Clinical deterioration was defined as death, respiratory failure, cardiac arrest, new dysrhythmia, sustained hypotension requiring vasopressors or volume resuscitation, or escalated intervention within 5 days of PE diagnosis. We determined sensitivity and specificity of sPESI, ESC, and PE‐SCORE for predicting clinical deterioration. Results Of 1569 patients, 24.5% had clinical deterioration within 5 days. sPESI, ESC, and PE‐SCORE classifications were low‐risk in 558 (35.6%), 167 (10.6%), and 309 (19.6%), respectively. Sensitivities of sPESI, ESC, and PE‐SCORE for clinical deterioration were 81.8 (78, 85.7), 98.7 (97.6, 99.8), and 96.1 (94.2, 98), respectively. Specificities of sPESI, ESC, and PE‐SCORE for clinical deterioration were 41.2 (38.4, 44), 13.7 (11.7, 15.6), and 24.8 (22.4, 27.3). Areas under the curve were 61.5 (59.1, 63.9), 56.2 (55.1, 57.3), and 60.5 (58.9, 62.0). Negative predictive values were 87.5 (84.7, 90.2), 97 (94.4, 99.6), and 95.1 (92.7, 97.5). Conclusions ESC and PE‐SCORE were better than sPESI for detecting clinical deterioration within 5 days after PE diagnosis.

Keywords

• clinical deterioration
• health care
• outcome assessment
• prognosis
• pulmonary embolism
• risk assessment