Frontiers in Surgery (Mar 2024)

Outcomes of balloon angioplasty and stent placement for iliac artery lesions classified as TASC II A, B: a single-center study

  • Le Duc Tin,
  • Le Duc Tin,
  • Lam Van Nut,
  • Abdelrahman Sherif Abdalla,
  • Hoang Duc,
  • Hoang Duc,
  • Patrick A. Kwaah,
  • Trang T. B. Le,
  • Trang T. B. Le,
  • Tran Thi Thuy Vy,
  • Thoa Le,
  • Thoa Le,
  • Pham Minh Anh,
  • Do Kim Que,
  • Nguyen Tien Huy,
  • Nguyen Tien Huy,
  • Nguyen Tien Huy

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1366338
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundIliac artery stenosis or occlusion is a critical condition that can severely impact a patient's quality of life. The effectiveness of balloon angioplasty and intraluminal stenting for the treatment of iliac artery lesions classified as TASC II A and B was evaluated in this single-center prospective study.MethodsConducted between October 2016 and September 2020 at Cho Ray Hospital's Vascular Surgery Department, this prospective study involved PAD patients categorized by TASC II A and B classifications who underwent endovascular intervention. Intervention outcomes were assessed peri-procedure and during short-term and mid-term follow-ups.ResultsOf the total of 133 patients, 34.6% underwent balloon angioplasty, while 65.4% received stenting. The immediate technical success rate was 97.7%, while the clinical success rate was 62.4%. Complications were minimal, with major limb amputation reported in 1.5% of the cases. There was a significant improvement in Rutherford classification and ABI at short-term follow-up, with a patency rate of 90.2%. The mid-term post-intervention follow-up yielded similar results with an 86.1% patency rate. The mortality rates associated with arterial occlusion were 2.3% during short-term follow-up and 1.7% during mid-term follow-up.ConclusionBalloon angioplasty and stent placement are effective and safe interventions for TASC II A and B iliac artery occlusions with favorable short and mid-term outcomes. Further, multi-center studies with larger sample sizes are recommended for more comprehensive conclusions, including long-term follow-up assessment.

Keywords