PLoS ONE (Jan 2016)

M-Cells Contribute to the Entry of an Oral Vaccine but Are Not Essential for the Subsequent Induction of Protective Immunity against Francisella tularensis.

  • Aimee L Cunningham,
  • M Neal Guentzel,
  • Jieh-Juen Yu,
  • Chiung-Yu Hung,
  • Thomas G Forsthuber,
  • Christopher S Navara,
  • Hideo Yagita,
  • Ifor R Williams,
  • Karl E Klose,
  • Tonyia D Eaves-Pyles,
  • Bernard P Arulanandam

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153402
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 4
p. e0153402

Abstract

Read online

M-cells (microfold cells) are thought to be a primary conduit of intestinal antigen trafficking. Using an established neutralizing anti-RANKL (Receptor Activator of NF-κB Ligand) antibody treatment to transiently deplete M-cells in vivo, we sought to determine whether intestinal M-cells were required for the effective induction of protective immunity following oral vaccination with ΔiglB (a defined live attenuated Francisella novicida mutant). M-cell depleted, ΔiglB-vaccinated mice exhibited increased (but not significant) morbidity and mortality following a subsequent homotypic or heterotypic pulmonary F. tularensis challenge. No significant differences in splenic IFN-γ, IL-2, or IL-17 or serum antibody (IgG1, IgG2a, IgA) production were observed compared to non-depleted, ΔiglB-vaccinated animals suggesting complementary mechanisms for ΔiglB entry. Thus, we examined other possible routes of gastrointestinal antigen sampling following oral vaccination and found that ΔiglB co-localized to villus goblet cells and enterocytes. These results provide insight into the role of M-cells and complementary pathways in intestinal antigen trafficking that may be involved in the generation of optimal immunity following oral vaccination.