Frontiers in Medicine (Sep 2024)
Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET versus [99mTc]Tc-MDP bone scan for diagnosing bone metastasis in prostate cancer: a head-to-head comparative meta-analysis
Abstract
PurposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of PSMA PET/CT, including [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]DCFPyL, in comparison with the [99mTc]Tc-MDP bone scan (BS) in identifying bone metastases among prostate cancer patients.MethodsA search was performed in the PubMed and Embase databases to locate pertinent publications from inception to February 12, 2024. The studies included were those that examined the diagnostic effectiveness of PSMA PET/CT (covering [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]DCFPyL) compared to [99mTc]Tc-MDP BS in identifying bone metastases among prostate cancer patients. The quality of the selected studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) checklist.ResultsThe meta-analysis included nine articles involving 702 patients. The sensitivity of PSMA PET/CT was higher compared to [99mTc]Tc-MDP BS (0.98 vs. 0.85, P < 0.01), while the specificity of PSMA PET/CT was also higher than [99mTc]Tc-MDP BS (0.97 vs. 0.70,P < 0.01). In subgroup analysis, the sensitivity of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was higher compared to [99mTc]Tc-MDP BS (0.98 vs. 0.86), while the specificity of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was also higher than [99mTc]Tc-MDP BS (0.98 vs. 0.65).ConclusionOur meta-analysis demonstrates that PSMA PET/CT exhibits superior sensitivity and specificity in comparison with [99mTc]Tc-MDP BS for identifying bone metastases in prostate cancer patients. Further research with head-to-head design is necessary to validate these results and evaluate the clinical effectiveness of these imaging methods.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier PROSPERO CRD42024545112.
Keywords
