Journal of Clinical Virology Plus (Aug 2022)

Clinical comparison and agreement of PCR, antigen, and viral culture for the diagnosis of COVID-19

  • Amanda Agard,
  • Omar Elsheikh,
  • Drew Bell,
  • Ryan F. Relich,
  • Bryan H. Schmitt,
  • Josh Sadowski,
  • William Fadel,
  • Douglas H. Webb,
  • Lana Dbeibo,
  • Kristen Kelley,
  • Mariel Carozza,
  • Guang-Shen Lei,
  • Paul Calkins,
  • Cole Beeler

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2, no. 3
p. 100099

Abstract

Read online

The aim of this study is to compare the COVID-19 nasopharyngeal PCR (NP PCR) to antigen, nasal PCR, and viral culture. One-hundred-and-fourteen risk-stratified patients were tested by culture, nasal PCR, NP PCR, and Ag testing. Twenty (48%) of the high risk and 23 (32%) of the low risk were NP PCR positive. Compared with NP PCR, the sensitivity of nasal PCR, Sofia Ag, BinaxNOW Ag, and culture were 44%, 31%, 37%, and 15%. In the high risk group, the sensitivity of these tests improved to 71%, 37%, 50%, and 22%. Agreement between tests was highest between nasal PCR and both antigen tests. Patients who were NP PCR positive but antigen negative were more likely to have remote prior COVID-19 infection (p<0.01). Nasal PCR and antigen positive patients were more likely to have symptoms (p = 0.01).

Keywords