Infectious Agents and Cancer (Aug 2022)

HPV genotyping by L1 amplicon sequencing of archived invasive cervical cancer samples: a pilot study

  • Charles D. Warden,
  • Preetam Cholli,
  • Hanjun Qin,
  • Chao Guo,
  • Yafan Wang,
  • Chetan Kancharla,
  • Angelique M. Russell,
  • Sylvana Salvatierra,
  • Lorraine Z. Mutsvunguma,
  • Kerin K. Higa,
  • Xiwei Wu,
  • Sharon Wilczynski,
  • Raju Pillai,
  • Javier Gordon Ogembo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-022-00456-w
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 17, no. 1
pp. 1 – 16

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the primary cause of invasive cervical cancer (ICC). The prevalence of various HPV genotypes, ranging from oncogenically low- to high-risk, may be influenced by geographic and demographic factors, which could have critical implications for the screening and prevention of HPV infection and ICC incidence. However, many technical factors may influence the identification of high-risk genotypes associated with ICC in different populations. Methods We used high-throughput sequencing of a single amplicon within the HPV L1 gene to assess the influence of patient age, race/ethnicity, histological subtype, sample type, collection date, experimental factors, and computational parameters on the prevalence of HPV genotypes detected in archived DNA (n = 34), frozen tissue (n = 44), and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue (n = 57) samples collected in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. Results We found that the percentage of off-target human reads and the concentration of DNA amplified from each sample varied by HPV genotype and by archive type. After accounting for the percentage of human reads and excluding samples with especially low levels of amplified DNA, the HPV prevalence was 95% across all ICC samples: HPV16 was the most common genotype (in 56% of all ICC samples), followed by HPV18 (in 21%). Depending upon the genotyping parameters, the prevalence of HPV58 varied up to twofold in our cohort. In archived DNA and frozen tissue samples, we detected previously established differences in HPV16 and HPV18 frequencies based on histological subtype, but we could not reproduce those findings using our FFPE samples. Conclusions In this pilot study, we demonstrate that sample collection, preparation, and analysis methods can influence the detection of certain HPV genotypes and must be carefully considered when drawing any biological conclusions based on HPV genotyping data from ICC samples.

Keywords