Clonal competition assays identify fitness signatures in cancer progression and resistance in multiple myeloma
Larissa Haertle,
Umair Munawar,
Hipólito N. C. Hernández,
Andres Arroyo‐Barea,
Tobias Heckel,
Isabel Cuenca,
Lucia Martin,
Carlotta Höschle,
Nicole Müller,
Cornelia Vogt,
Thorsten Bischler,
Paula L. delCampo,
Seungbin Han,
Natalia Buenache,
Xiang Zhou,
Florian Bassermann,
Johannes Waldschmidt,
Torsten Steinbrunn,
Leo Rasche,
Thorsten Stühmer,
Joaquin Martinez‐Lopez,
K. Martin Kortüm,
Santiago Barrio
Affiliations
Larissa Haertle
Department of Internal Medicine II University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany
Umair Munawar
Department of Internal Medicine II University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany
Hipólito N. C. Hernández
Department of Hematology Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Complutense University Madrid Madrid Spain
Andres Arroyo‐Barea
Department of Hematology Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Complutense University Madrid Madrid Spain
Tobias Heckel
Core Unit Systems Medicine University of Würzburg Würzburg Germany
Isabel Cuenca
Department of Hematology Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Complutense University Madrid Madrid Spain
Lucia Martin
Department of Hematology Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Complutense University Madrid Madrid Spain
Carlotta Höschle
TranslaTUM, Center for Translational Cancer Research Technical University of Munich Munich Germany
Nicole Müller
Department of Internal Medicine II University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany
Cornelia Vogt
Department of Internal Medicine II University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany
Thorsten Bischler
Core Unit Systems Medicine University of Würzburg Würzburg Germany
Paula L. delCampo
Department of Hematology Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Complutense University Madrid Madrid Spain
Seungbin Han
Department of Internal Medicine II University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany
Natalia Buenache
Department of Hematology Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Complutense University Madrid Madrid Spain
Xiang Zhou
Department of Internal Medicine II University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany
Florian Bassermann
Department of Medicine III, Klinikum rechts der Isar Technical University of Munich Munich Germany
Johannes Waldschmidt
Department of Internal Medicine II University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany
Torsten Steinbrunn
Department of Internal Medicine II University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany
Leo Rasche
Department of Internal Medicine II University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany
Thorsten Stühmer
Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany
Joaquin Martinez‐Lopez
Department of Hematology Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Complutense University Madrid Madrid Spain
K. Martin Kortüm
Department of Internal Medicine II University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany
Santiago Barrio
Department of Hematology Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Complutense University Madrid Madrid Spain
Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is a genetically heterogeneous disease and the management of relapses is one of the biggest clinical challenges. TP53 alterations are established high‐risk markers and are included in the current disease staging criteria. KRAS is the most frequently mutated gene affecting around 20% of MM patients. Applying Clonal Competition Assays (CCA) by co‐culturing color‐labeled genetically modified cell models, we recently showed that mono‐ and biallelic alterations in TP53 transmit a fitness advantage to the cells. Here, we report a similar dynamic for two mutations in KRAS (G12A and A146T), providing a biological rationale for the high frequency of KRAS and TP53 alterations at MM relapse. Resistance mutations, on the other hand, did not endow MM cells with a general fitness advantage but rather presented a disadvantage compared to the wild‐type. CUL4B KO and IKZF1 A152T transmit resistance against immunomodulatory agents, PSMB5 A20T to proteasome inhibition. However, MM cells harboring such lesions only outcompete the culture in the presence of the respective drug. To better prevent the selection of clones with the potential of inducing relapse, these results argue in favor of treatment‐free breaks or a switch of the drug class given as maintenance therapy. In summary, the fitness benefit of TP53 and KRAS mutations was not treatment‐related, unlike patient‐derived drug resistance alterations that may only induce an advantage under treatment. CCAs are suitable models for the study of clonal evolution and competitive (dis)advantages conveyed by a specific genetic lesion of interest, and their dependence on external factors such as the treatment.