BMC Psychiatry (Jun 2024)

Health economics study of paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of schizophrenia: a 12-month cohort study

  • Xing Luo,
  • Fang Liu,
  • Jin Lu,
  • Yuqi Cheng,
  • Xiufeng Xu,
  • Xiaolin He,
  • Yongbing Xia,
  • Changqing Gao,
  • Xian Xie,
  • Yu Zhao,
  • Chunqiang Gao,
  • Hua Ding,
  • Yuefei He,
  • Lifen Zhang,
  • Xi Zhang,
  • Jianhui Song,
  • Shunying Yang,
  • Liming Liu,
  • Wenming Chen,
  • Wei Liu,
  • Chuanlin Luo,
  • Ensheng Pu,
  • Ming Lei,
  • Yan Wang,
  • Zanzong Sun,
  • Rucheng Yang,
  • Yong Zhou,
  • Xianrong Zhu,
  • Bo Wang,
  • Shuhua He,
  • Donghua Gao,
  • Zhongcai Li,
  • Liqiong Huang,
  • Tianlan Wang,
  • Guangya Yang,
  • Hong Liu,
  • Jinkun Zhao,
  • Jicai Wang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05874-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 6

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background To analyze the economic benefits of paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of schizophrenia. Methods We collected 546 patients who met the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia according to the 《International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems,10th》(ICD-10). We gathered general population data such as gender, age, marital status, and education level, then initiated treatment with paliperidone palmitate. Then Follow-up evaluations were conducted at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the start of treatment to assess clinical efficacy, adverse reactions, and injection doses. We also collected information on the economic burden before and after 12 months of treatment, as well as the number of outpatient visits and hospitalizations in the past year to analyze economic benefits. Results The baseline patients totaled 546, with 239 still receiving treatment with paliperidone palmitate 12 months later. After 12 months of treatment, the number of outpatient visits per year increased compared to before (4 (2,10) vs. 12 (4,12), Z=-5.949, P 0.05); the indirect costs of patients after 12 months of treatment (lost productivity costs for patients and families, economic costs due to destructive behavior, costs of seeking non-medical assistance) decreased compared to before (300(150,600) vs. 150(100,200), P < 0.05). Conclusion Palmatine palmitate reduces the number of hospitalizations for patients, as well as their direct and indirect economic burdens, and has good economic benefits.

Keywords