Scientific Reports (Apr 2024)

Physical and structural characterization of bis-acryl composite resin

  • Wendy E. Rodríguez-Guardado,
  • Eric M. Rivera-Muñoz,
  • Janeth Serrano-Bello,
  • Marco A. Alvarez-Perez,
  • Rubén A. Domínguez-Pérez,
  • Elias Nahum Salmerón-Valdés,
  • Febe C. Vázquez Vázquez,
  • Osmar A. Chanes-Cuevas,
  • Beatriz Millán-Malo,
  • Carmen L. Peza-Ledesma,
  • Rodrigo Correa-Prado

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58649-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 6

Abstract

Read online

Abstract During the preparation of fixed prosthesis (including individual bridges and crowns) it is important to select the materials that have the best features and properties to predict a successful clinical treatment. The objective of this study was to determine if the chemical and structural characteristics could cause to increase the fracture resistance, we used four bis-acryl resins Luxatemp, Protemp, Structur and Telio. Three-points bending by Flexural test were performed in ten bars and they were carried out to compare with Anova test. In addition, the bis-acryl resins were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, to analyze microstructure and morphology and the molecular structure were performed by Infrared Spectroscopy through Attenuated Total Reflectance. A higher flexural strength was found in Luxatemp and Structur with, no significant differences between this study groups. Regarding Protemp and Telio, these study groups showed a lower flexural strength when were compared with Luxatemp and Structur. These results corroborate SEM and ATR analysis because Luxatemp sample showed a regular size particle on the surface and chemically presents a long cross-linkage polymer chain. The presence of CO3, SiO2 and N–H groups as a fillers particle interacting with OH groups cause a higher flexural strength compared with another groups.

Keywords