Blood Cancer Journal (Nov 2022)

Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on toxicities after CAR T cell therapy for lymphoma and myeloma

  • Kevin Charles Miller,
  • Patrick Connor Johnson,
  • Jeremy S. Abramson,
  • Jacob D. Soumerai,
  • Andrew J. Yee,
  • Andrew R. Branagan,
  • Elizabeth K. O’Donnell,
  • Anna Saucier,
  • Caron A. Jacobson,
  • Matthew J. Frigault,
  • Noopur S. Raje

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00741-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 10
pp. 1 – 12

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T) are groundbreaking therapies but may cause significant toxicities including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and cytopenias. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is often used to mitigate neutropenia after CAR T, but there is no consensus recommended strategy due to hypothesized, but largely unknown risks of exacerbating toxicities. To investigate the impact of G-CSF, we retrospectively analyzed 197 patients treated with anti-CD19 CAR T for lymphoma and 47 patients treated with anti-BCMA CAR T for multiple myeloma. In lymphoma, 140 patients (71%) received prophylactic G-CSF before CAR T (mostly pegylated G-CSF) and were compared with 57 patients (29%) treated with G-CSF after CAR T or not exposed. Prophylactic G-CSF was associated with faster neutrophil recovery (3 vs. 4 days, P < 0.01) but did not reduce recurrent neutropenia later. Prophylactic G-CSF was associated with increased grade ≥2 CRS (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.11–4.18, P = 0.02), but not ICANS. In multiple myeloma, prophylactic G-CSF was not used; patients were stratified by early G-CSF exposure (≤2 days vs. ≥3 days after CAR T or no exposure), with no significant difference in toxicities. Future trials should clarify the optimal G-CSF strategy to improve outcomes after CAR T.