Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology (Jul 2021)

Oral vinorelbine and cisplatin as first-line therapy for advanced squamous NSCLC patients: a prospective randomized international phase II study (NAVoTrial 03)

  • Francesco Grossi,
  • Piotr Jaśkiewicz,
  • Marion Ferreira,
  • Grzegorz Czyżewicz,
  • Dariusz Kowalski,
  • Libero Ciuffreda,
  • Ramon Garcia-Gomez,
  • Salvatore Caruso,
  • Joaquim Bosch-Barrera,
  • Stéphanie Gautier,
  • Christine Ta Thanh Minh,
  • Sébastien Henriet,
  • Gilberto de Castro

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359211022905
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

Objective: The study investigated the efficacy and safety of oral vinorelbine-cisplatin (OV-CDDP) and gemcitabine-cisplatin (GEM-CDDP) in patients with squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sq-NSCLC). Patients and methods: This was an open-label, prospective, multicenter, international phase II study that enrolled untreated patients with advanced sq-NSCLC. Patients were randomized to receive 3-week cycles of either 60–80 mg/m 2 OV days 1 and 8 in combination with 80 mg/m 2 CDDP day 1 (arm A) or 1250 mg/m 2 GEM days 1 and 8 in combination with 75 mg/m 2 CDDP day 1 (arm B). After four cycles, patients without disease progression continued maintenance dose of OV or GEM until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was disease control rate (DCR). Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life (QoL). Results: A total of 114 patients with sq-NSCLC were randomized, and 113 were treated (57 in arm A and 56 in arm B). DCR was high in both arms: 73.7% (95%CI: 62.4–100.0) in arm A and 75.0% (95%CI: 63.7–100.0) in arm B. Median PFS and TTF were similar in arm A and B 4.2 and 2.8 months, and 4.3 and 3.1 months, respectively. Even though the difference was not significant, the OS was 10.2 for arm A and 8.4 months for arm B. The safety profiles were consistent with the current knowledge of adverse events. QoL results revealed an improvement in patients under OV treatment. Conclusion: The OV-CDDP combination showed comparable efficacy to GEM-CDDP with acceptable safety profile and enhanced patients’ QoL. Trial registration: The study was registered under EudraCT number 2012-003531-40.