Annals of Intensive Care (Jan 2018)

Response to different furosemide doses predicts AKI progression in ICU patients with elevated plasma NGAL levels

  • Ryo Matsuura,
  • Yohei Komaru,
  • Yoshihisa Miyamoto,
  • Teruhiko Yoshida,
  • Kohei Yoshimoto,
  • Rei Isshiki,
  • Kengo Mayumi,
  • Tetsushi Yamashita,
  • Yoshifumi Hamasaki,
  • Masaomi Nangaku,
  • Eisei Noiri,
  • Naoto Morimura,
  • Kent Doi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0355-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Furosemide responsiveness (FR) is determined by urine output after furosemide administration and has recently been evaluated as a furosemide stress test (FST) for predicting severe acute kidney injury (AKI) progression. Although a standardized furosemide dose is required for FST, variable dosing is typically employed based on illness severity, including renal dysfunction in the clinical setting. This study aimed to evaluate whether FR with different furosemide doses can predict AKI progression. We further evaluated the combination of an AKI biomarker, plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and FR for predicting AKI progression. Results We retrospectively analyzed 95 patients who were treated with bolus furosemide in our medical–surgical intensive care unit. Patients who had already developed AKI stage 3 were excluded. A total of 18 patients developed AKI stage 3 within 1 week. Receiver operating curve analysis revealed that the area under the curve (AUC) values of FR and plasma NGAL were 0.87 (0.73–0.94) and 0.80 (0.67–0.88) for AKI progression, respectively. When plasma NGAL level was 142 ng/mL. FR was associated with AUC of 0.84 (0.67–0.94) for AKI progression in this population with high NGAL levels. Conclusions Although different variable doses of furosemide were administered, FR revealed favorable efficacy for predicting AKI progression even in patients with high plasma NGAL levels. This suggests that a combination of FR and biomarkers can stratify the risk of AKI progression in a clinical setting.

Keywords