Comparative Study of Three Mixing Methods in Fusion Technique for Determining Major and Minor Elements Using Wavelength Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy

Abstract

Accurate analysis using a simple and rapid procedure is always the most important pursuit of analytical chemists. In this study, a new sample preparation procedure, namely the shaker cup (SH) method, was designed and compared with two sample preparation procedures, commonly used in the laboratory, from three aspects: homogeneity of the sample–flux mixture, potential for sample contamination, and sample preparation time. For the three methods, a set of 54 certified reference materials (CRMs) was used to establish the calibration curves, while another set of 19 CRMs was measured to validate the results. In the calibration procedures, the matrix effects were corrected using the theoretical alpha coefficient method combined with the experimental coefficient method. The data of the major oxides (SiO2, TiO2, Al2O3, TFe2O3, MnO, MgO, CaO, Na2O, K2O, and P2O5) and minor elements (Cr, Cu, Ba, Ni, Sr, V, Zr, and Zn) obtained by wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (WD-XRF) were compared using two derivative equations based on the findings by Laurence Whitty-Léveillé. The results revealed that the WD-XRF measured values using the SH method best agreed with the values recommended in the literature.

Keywords

• wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy
• sample preparation procedure
• fused glass disc
• shaker cup method