Infectious Diseases of Poverty (Dec 2018)

Parasite reduction ratio one day after initiation of artemisinin-based combination therapies and its relationship with parasite clearance time in acutely malarious children

  • Kazeem Akano,
  • Godwin Ntadom,
  • Chimere Agomo,
  • Christian T. Happi,
  • Onikepe A. Folarin,
  • Grace O. Gbotosho,
  • Olugbenga Mokuolu,
  • Finomo Finomo,
  • Joy C. Ebenebe,
  • Nma Jiya,
  • Jose Ambe,
  • Robinson Wammanda,
  • George Emechebe,
  • Oluwabunmi K. Basorun,
  • Olubunmi A. Wewe,
  • Sikiru Amoo,
  • Nnenna Ezeigwe,
  • Stephen Oguche,
  • Bayo Fatunmbi,
  • Akintunde Sowunmi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-018-0503-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background In acute falciparum malaria, asexual parasite reduction ratio two days post-treatment initiation (PRRD2) ≥ 10 000 per cycle has been used as a measure of the rapid clearance of parasitaemia and efficacy of artemisinin derivatives. However, there is little evaluation of alternative measures; for example, parasite reduction ratio one day after treatment initiation (PRRD1) and its relationship with parasite clearance time (PCT) or PRRD2. This study evaluated the use of PRRD1 as a measure of responsiveness to antimalarial drugs. Methods In acutely malarious children treated with artesunate-amodiaquine (AA), artemether-lumefantrine (AL) or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHP), the relationships between PRRD1 or PRRD2 and PCT, and between PRRD1 and PRRD2 were evaluated using linear regression. Agreement between estimates of PCT using PRRD1 and PRRD2 linear regression equations was evaluated using the Bland-Altman analysis. Predictors of PRRD1 > 5000 per half cycle and PRRD2 ≥ 10 000 per cycle were evaluated using stepwise multiple logistic regression models. Using the linear regression equation of the relationship between PRRD1 and PCT previously generated in half of the DHP-treated children during the early study phase, PCT estimates were compared in a prospective blinded manner with PCTs determined by microscopy during the later study phase in the remaining half. Results In 919 malarious children, PRRD1 was significantly higher in DHP- and AA-treated compared with AL-treated children (P 15 months, parasitaemia > 10 000/μl and DHP treatment independently predicted PRRD1 > 5000 per half cycle, while age > 30 months, haematocrit ≥31%, body temperature > 37.4 °C, parasitaemia > 100 000/μl, PRRD1 value > 1000 and no gametocytaemia independently predicted PRRD2 ≥ 10 000 per cycle. Using the linear regression equation generated during the early phase in 166 DHP-treated children, PCT estimates and PCTs determined by microscopy in the 155 children in the later phase were similar in the same patients. Conclusions PRRD1 and estimates of PCT using PRRD1 linear regression equation of PRRD1 and PCT can be used in therapeutic efficacy studies. Trial registration Pan African Clinical Trial Registration PACTR201709002064150, 1 March 2017, http://www.pactr.org

Keywords