PLoS ONE (Jan 2019)

Body fat anthropometric indexes: Which of those identify better high cardiovascular risk subjects? A comparative study in Spanish population.

  • Arturo Corbatón Anchuelo,
  • María Teresa Martínez-Larrad,
  • Irene Serrano-García,
  • Cristina Fernández Pérez,
  • Manuel Serrano-Ríos

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216877
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 5
p. e0216877

Abstract

Read online

AimTo determine the association of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), waist to hip ratio (WHR), waist to height ratio (WHtr) and Body Shape Index (ABSI) with high cardiovascular risk (CVR), as well as to determine whether how strong are these relationships.Material and methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out in Spanish Caucasian adults. 3,456 subjects completed the study, 45.78% males, aged ResultsMost significant AUCs in males were: WHtr and ABSI for Framingham ≥ 20% and SCORE ≥ 5%. Also significant were WHtr, WC and ABSI for ACCA/AHA ≥ 7.5%. On the other hand, most significant AUCs in females were: WHtr and WC for Framingham ≥ 20%; and WHtr and WHR for SCORE ≥ 5%, WHtr, and WC for ACC/AHA guide ≥ 7.5%.ConclusionsOverall, the best anthropometric index identifying Spanish males and females who are at high risk for CV events is WHtr. ABSI was also found to be a good anthropometric index to predict high CVR in Spanish males according to FR, SCORE and ACC/AHA charts. For Spanish females, WC is a good anthropometric index according to FR and ACC/AHA guide, while WHR is better according to SCORE.