Cancer Medicine (Aug 2024)

Atypical cancer risk profile in carriers of Italian founder BRCA1 variant p.His1673del: Implications for classification and clinical management

  • Giovanni Innella,
  • Cristina Fortuno,
  • Laura Caleca,
  • Bing‐Jian Feng,
  • Courtney Carroll,
  • Michael T. Parsons,
  • Sara Miccoli,
  • Marco Montagna,
  • Daniele Calistri,
  • Laura Cortesi,
  • Barbara Pasini,
  • Siranoush Manoukian,
  • Daniela Giachino,
  • Laura Matricardi,
  • Maria Cristina Foti,
  • Valentina Zampiga,
  • Claudia Piombino,
  • Elena Barbieri,
  • Francesca Vignolo Lutati,
  • Jacopo Azzolini,
  • Rita Danesi,
  • Valentina Arcangeli,
  • Sandrine M. Caputo,
  • Nadia Boutry‐Kryza,
  • Vincent Goussot,
  • Susan Hiraki,
  • Marcy Richardson,
  • Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer IOV network (HBOC IOVnet),
  • Simona Ferrari,
  • Paolo Radice,
  • Amanda B. Spurdle,
  • Daniela Turchetti

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70114
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 16
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background BRCA1:c.5017_5019del (p.His1673del) is a founder variant relatively frequent in Northern Italy. Despite previous suggestion of pathogenicity, variant classification in public databases is still conflicting, needing additional evidence. Methods Maximum likelihood penetrance of breast/ovarian and other cancer types was estimated using full pedigree data from 53 informative Italian families. The effect of the variant on BRCA1‐ABRAXAS1 interaction was assessed using a GFP‐fragment reassembly‐based PPI assay. Results were combined with additional data from multiple sources to classify the variant according to ACMG/AMP classification rules specified for BRCA1/2. Results Variant‐carriers displayed increased risk for ovarian cancer (HR = 33.0, 95% CI = 7.0–155.0; cumulative risk at age 70 = 27.6%, 95% CI = 12.6–40.0%) but not for breast cancer (HR = 0.7, 95% CI = 0.2–2.2). An increased risk of uterine cancer (HR = 8.0, 95% CI = 1.03–61.6) emerged, warranting further evaluation. Likelihood‐ratio in favor of pathogenicity was 98898642.82 under assumption of standard BRCA1 breast and ovarian penetrance, and 104240832.84 after excluding breast cancer diagnoses (based on penetrance results). Functional analysis demonstrated that the variant abrogates the BRCA1‐ABRAXAS1 binding, supporting the PS3 code assignment within the ACMG/AMP rule‐based model. Collectively, these findings allowed to classify the variant as pathogenic. Conclusion Pathogenicity of BRCA1:c.5017_5019del(p.His1673del) has been confirmed; however, breast cancer risk in Italian families is not increased, unlike in families from other countries and in carriers of most BRCA1 pathogenic variants. The knowledge of atypical risk profiles for this and other variants will pave the way for personalized management based on specific genotype.

Keywords