MethodsX (Jan 2021)

Multimethod to prioritize projects evaluated in different formats

  • Felipe Diniz Ramalho,
  • Iara Sibele Silva,
  • Petr Y. Ekel,
  • Carlos Augusto Paiva da Silva Martins,
  • Patrícia Bernardes,
  • Matheus Pereira Libório

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8
p. 101371

Abstract

Read online

The prioritization of Research, Development & Innovation Projects is an essential step in the innovation management process. As a rule, it is carried out applying methods that allow one to process experts' preferences concerning each project according to established criteria. However, there are different preference formats which experts can utilize: Ordering of Alternatives, Utility Values, Multiplicative Preference Relations, Fuzzy Estimates, Fuzzy Preference Relations, etc. Wherein, each prioritization method usually handles only one of these formats. Thus, the following question arises: how do we prioritize projects taken from portfolios evaluated in different formats? The proposed methodology presents a way to overcome this gap by achieving three main objectives. First, develop techniques that make it possible to crossover between preference formats and prioritization methods. Second, merge two portfolios of projects built applying different prioritization methods. Third, prioritize projects evaluated using different formats. The results of this study are universal and can be applied to replace any method of prioritization. In the specific case, the Mapping method is replaced by the Analytic Hierarchy Process and, then, by the Interactive Multicriteria Decision Making method (so called TODIM method). Techniques are also proposed to ensure compatibility between different preference formats and prioritization methods. • Prioritization of projects evaluated in different formats using the Mapping, AHP, and TODIM methods. • Providing fully consistent evaluation matrices. • Application of techniques to make different preference formats and prioritization methods compatible.

Keywords