Cancer Medicine (Apr 2023)

Patterns of care and outcome of CIC‐rearranged sarcoma patients: A nationwide study of the French sarcoma group

  • Mehdi Brahmi,
  • Nathalie Gaspar,
  • Justine Gantzer,
  • Maud Toulmonde,
  • Pascaline Boudou‐Rouquette,
  • emmanuelle Bompas,
  • Nelly Firmin,
  • Thibaud Valentin,
  • Mathilde Cancel,
  • Florence Duffaud,
  • Francois Bertucci,
  • Christophe Perrin,
  • Armelle Dufresne,
  • Perrine Marec‐Bérard,
  • Myriam Jean‐Denis,
  • Isabelle Ray‐Coquard,
  • Francois Le Loarer,
  • Gaille Pierron,
  • Franck Tirode,
  • Jean‐Yves Blay,
  • Sarah Watson

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5539
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 7
pp. 7801 – 7807

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background CIC‐rearranged sarcomas (CIC‐RS) represent the most frequent subset of “Ewing‐like” undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas. These tumors tend to be more aggressive than Ewing sarcomas. Moreover, treatment strategy can differ according to teams. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to describe the characteristics, treatments, and outcome for patients with CIC‐RS included in the French NETSARC+ database. Methods Pediatric and adult patients from 13 French centers with a diagnosis of CIC‐RS were registered from October 2008 to March 2021. Patients and tumors characteristics were collected from the national network NETSARC+ database (http://netsarc.sarcomabcb.org). CIC‐RS diagnosis was pathologically and molecularly confirmed with a central review by expert pathologists. Two groups of patients were studied: those treated as classical Ewing sarcomas (cohort EwS) and those treated as high‐grade soft tissue sarcomas (cohort STS) according to ESMO and/or EpSSG guidelines. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log‐rank test was used to compare survival. Results Among 79 patients, the male/female sex ratio was 0.7 and the median age at diagnosis was 27 years (range 2–87). With a median follow‐up of 37 months, 39 patients died of the disease. Median overall survival from diagnosis was 18 months, with no significant difference between both cohorts (p = 0.9). Nevertheless, when focusing on patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis (N = 21), all patients from cohort STS died of disease while some patients from cohort EwS were still alive and in complete remission. Conclusion FSG experience confirms the aggressive clinical course of CDS patients regardless of chemotherapy regimen.

Keywords