International Journal of Molecular Sciences (May 2019)

Clinical Implications of Discordant Early Molecular Responses in CML Patients Treated with Imatinib

  • Stefania Stella,
  • Valentina Zammit,
  • Silvia Rita Vitale,
  • Maria Stella Pennisi,
  • Michele Massimino,
  • Elena Tirrò,
  • Stefano Forte,
  • Antonio Spitaleri,
  • Agostino Antolino,
  • Sergio Siracusa,
  • Vincenzo Accurso,
  • Donato Mannina,
  • Stefana Impera,
  • Caterina Musolino,
  • Sabina Russo,
  • Alessandra Malato,
  • Giuseppe Mineo,
  • Maurizio Musso,
  • Ferdinando Porretto,
  • Bruno Martino,
  • Francesco Di Raimondo,
  • Livia Manzella,
  • Paolo Vigneri,
  • Fabio Stagno

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20092226
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 20, no. 9
p. 2226

Abstract

Read online

A reduction in BCR-ABL1/ABL1IS transcript levels to <10% after 3 months or <1% after 6 months of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy are associated with superior clinical outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. In this study, we investigated the reliability of multiple BCR-ABL1 thresholds in predicting treatment outcomes for 184 subjects diagnosed with CML and treated with standard-dose imatinib mesylate (IM). With a median follow-up of 61 months, patients with concordant BCR-ABL1/ABL1IS transcripts below the defined thresholds (10% at 3 months and 1% at 6 months) displayed significantly superior rates of event-free survival (86.1% vs. 26.6%) and deep molecular response (≥ MR4; 71.5% vs. 16.1%) compared to individuals with BCR-ABL1/ABL1IS levels above these defined thresholds. We then analyzed the outcomes of subjects displaying discordant molecular transcripts at 3- and 6-month time points. Among these patients, those with BCR-ABL1/ABL1IS values >10% at 3 months but <1% at 6 months fared significantly better than individuals with BCR-ABL1/ABL1IS <10% at 3 months but >1% at 6 months (event-free survival 68.2% vs. 32.7%; p < 0.001). Likewise, subjects with BCR-ABL1/ABL1IS at 3 months >10% but <1% at 6 months showed a higher cumulative incidence of MR4 compared to patients with BCR-ABL1/ABL1IS <10% at 3 months but >1% at 6 months (75% vs. 18.2%; p < 0.001). Finally, lower BCR-ABL1/GUSIS transcripts at diagnosis were associated with BCR-ABL1/ABL1IS values <1% at 6 months (p < 0.001). Our data suggest that when assessing early molecular responses to therapy, the 6-month BCR-ABL1/ABL1IS level displays a superior prognostic value compared to the 3-month measurement in patients with discordant oncogenic transcripts at these two pivotal time points.

Keywords