TATuP – Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis (Mar 2024)

Artificial intelligence and judicial decision-making: Evaluating the role of AI in debiasing

  • Giovana Lopes

DOI
https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.33.1.28
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 33, no. 1

Abstract

Read online

As arbiters of law and fact, judges are supposed to decide cases impartially, basing their decisions on authoritative legal sources and not being influenced by irrelevant factors. Empirical evidence, however, shows that judges are often influenced by implicit biases, which can affect the impartiality of their judgment and pose a threat to the right to a fair trial. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly used for a variety of applications in the public domain, often with the promise of being more accurate and objective than biased human decision-makers. Given this backdrop, this research article identifies how AI is being deployed by courts, mainly as decision-support tools for judges. It assesses the potential and limitations of these tools, focusing on their use for risk assessment. Further, the article shows how AI can be used as a debiasing tool, i. e., to detect patterns of bias in judicial decisions, allowing for corrective measures to be taken. Finally, it assesses the mechanisms and benefits of such use.

Keywords