Sarcoma (Jan 2020)

PET/CT Imaging as a Diagnostic Tool in Distinguishing Well-Differentiated versus Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma

  • Amanda Parkes,
  • Elizabeth Urquiola,
  • Priya Bhosale,
  • Heather Lin,
  • Kelsey Watson,
  • Wei-Lien Wang,
  • Barry Feig,
  • Keila Torres,
  • Christina L. Roland,
  • Anthony P. Conley,
  • Maria Zarzour,
  • J. Andrew Livingston,
  • Ravin Ratan,
  • Joseph Ludwig,
  • Dejka M. Araujo,
  • Vinod Ravi,
  • Robert S. Benjamin,
  • Shreyaskumar Patel,
  • Neeta Somaiah

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8363986
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2020

Abstract

Read online

Distinguishing well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) from dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is essential given distinct treatment paradigms and chemosensitivity. Percutaneous biopsy has a low sensitivity for detecting DDLPS. We sought to identify the diagnostic utility of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in identifying WDLPS versus DDLPS. An independent radiologist reviewed PET/CT images to identify target lesions and determine the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). An independent pathologist review confirmed WDLPS or DDLPS histology. A binary cutoff point of SUVmax was identified using a classification and regression trees (CART) algorithm. We identified 20 patients with WDLPS or DDLPS with 26 PET/CTs performed for separate recurrences that were followed by surgical sampling. Of the 26 records, 12 were DDLPS (46%) and 14 were WDLPS (54%). Patients with DDLPS had significantly higher SUVmax than those with WDLPS (p value = 0.0035). A SUVmax of 4 was identified as the cutoff point. Using this cutoff, the sensitivity of SUVmax identifying a case as DDLPS was 83.3% (95% CI: 51.6%, 97.9%) and the specificity was 85.7% (95% CI: 57.2%, 98.2%). PET/CT is a sensitive and specific diagnostic tool to identify the presence of dedifferentiation within the tumor.