Cancers (Jun 2023)

Tebentafusp in Patients with Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Real-Life Retrospective Multicenter Study

  • Dirk Tomsitz,
  • Theresa Ruf,
  • Markus Heppt,
  • Ramon Staeger,
  • Egle Ramelyte,
  • Reinhard Dummer,
  • Marlene Garzarolli,
  • Friedegund Meier,
  • Eileen Meier,
  • Heike Richly,
  • Tanja Gromke,
  • Jens T. Siveke,
  • Cindy Franklin,
  • Kai-Christian Klespe,
  • Cornelia Mauch,
  • Teresa Kilian,
  • Marlene Seegräber,
  • Bastian Schilling,
  • Lars E. French,
  • Carola Berking,
  • Lucie Heinzerling

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15133430
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 13
p. 3430

Abstract

Read online

Background: Tebentafusp has recently been approved for the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) after proving to have survival benefits in a first-line setting. Patients and Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study analyzed the outcomes and safety of tebentafusp therapy in 78 patients with mUM. Results: Patients treated with tebentafusp had a median PFS of 3 months (95% CI 2.7 to 3.3) and a median OS of 22 months (95% CI 10.6 to 33.4). In contrast to a published Phase 3 study, our cohort had a higher rate of patients with elevated LDH (65.4% vs. 35.7%) and included patients with prior systemic and local ablative therapies. In patients treated with tebentafusp following ICI, there was a trend for a longer median OS (28 months, 95% CI 26.9 to 29.1) compared to the inverse treatment sequence (24 months, 95% CI 13.0 to 35.0, p = 0.257). The most common treatment-related adverse events were cytokine release syndrome in 71.2% and skin toxicity in 53.8% of patients. Tumor lysis syndrome occurred in one patient. Conclusions: Data from this real-life cohort showed a median PFS/OS similar to published Phase 3 trial data. Treatment with ICI followed by tebentafusp may result in longer PFS/OS compared to the inverse treatment sequence.

Keywords