Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (Sep 2019)

Disinhibited Revenge – An fNIRS Study on Forgiveness and Cognitive Control

  • Moritz Julian Maier,
  • Moritz Julian Maier,
  • David Rosenbaum,
  • Florian Benedikt Haeussinger,
  • Martin Brüne,
  • Andreas Jochen Fallgatter,
  • Andreas Jochen Fallgatter,
  • Andreas Jochen Fallgatter,
  • Ann-Christine Ehlis,
  • Ann-Christine Ehlis

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00223
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13

Abstract

Read online

The ability to reconcile is a key factor for a cooperative and successful life. Among the many factors that have an impact on how people negotiate social contracts, poor cognitive control (which is inversely linked to impulsivity) may exert negative effects on forgiveness. To investigate the neurobiological basis of this proposition, subjects with high vs. low impulsivity scores completed an ultimatum game (UG) and a dictator game (DG). First, the participants played an UG where they had to accept or reject offers from fair or unfair opponents. Afterward, the roles changed, and a DG was played. Here, subjects had the opportunity to forgive or take revenge on unfair opponents by the allocation of a fair/unfair amount of money. During this task, activity of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was assessed via functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). Highly impulsive subjects were significantly more revenge-seeking than individuals with a low impulsivity. This behavioral difference was reflected in the activation pattern of the left DLPFC, where higher activation in trials with unfair opponents was found, but only in the highly impulsive group. This result is discussed as an indicator of more revenge-driven behavior in highly impulsive individuals, since activity in the left DLPFC is associated with retaliation.

Keywords