Frontiers in Pediatrics (Feb 2022)

Characterizing Neurocognitive Impairment in Juvenile Fibromyalgia Syndrome: Subjective and Objective Measures of Dyscognition

  • Sabrina Gmuca,
  • Sabrina Gmuca,
  • Sabrina Gmuca,
  • Sabrina Gmuca,
  • Maitry Sonagra,
  • Maitry Sonagra,
  • Maitry Sonagra,
  • Maitry Sonagra,
  • Rui Xiao,
  • Rui Xiao,
  • Elizabeth Mendoza,
  • Elizabeth Mendoza,
  • Kimberly S. Miller,
  • Kimberly S. Miller,
  • Nina H. Thomas,
  • Nina H. Thomas,
  • Nina H. Thomas,
  • Jami F. Young,
  • Jami F. Young,
  • Jami F. Young,
  • Pamela F. Weiss,
  • Pamela F. Weiss,
  • Pamela F. Weiss,
  • David D. Sherry,
  • David D. Sherry,
  • Jeffrey S. Gerber,
  • Jeffrey S. Gerber,
  • Jeffrey S. Gerber

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.848009
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10

Abstract

Read online

ObjectivesOur understanding of brain fog, or dyscognition, among youth with juvenile fibromyalgia syndrome is limited. We aimed to determine the prevalence of subjective (self-reported) and objective dyscognition, as well as factors associated with subjective dyscognition in juvenile fibromyalgia syndrome.MethodsA cross-sectional cohort study of patients (n = 31) 12-17 years old diagnosed with primary juvenile fibromyalgia syndrome and one of their parents from 2017 to 2019. Subjects completed a series of survey measures and patients completed a brief neurocognitive battery. Subjective dyscognition was determined based on scores on the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Cognitive Functioning Scale and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-2) global executive composite (GEC). Objective dyscognition was defined as impairment of more than two standard deviations in any of the neurocognitive domains. We used Fisher's exact test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, as appropriate, to compare clinical patients based on the presence of dyscognition. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was performed to determine factors associated with subjective dyscognition.ResultsOf the 31 subjects, 65% reported subjective dyscognition and 39% had objective dyscognition, primarily in the domains of psychomotor speed (23%), executive function (23%), and attention (3%). Subjective dyscognition was not indicative of objective dyscognition. Subjective dyscognition was independently associated with functional disability (OR: 1.19 [95% CI: 1.02-1.40]) and anxiety (OR: 1.12 [95% CI: 1.02-1.24]).DiscussionAdolescents with fibromyalgia predominantly experience subjective dyscognition but more than 1/3 also experience objective dyscognition. Future research should explore the impact of interdisciplinary rehabilitation programs on the treatment of dyscognition in youth with JFMS.

Keywords