Journal of Molecular Pathology (Jun 2022)

<i>BRAF</i> and <i>MLH1</i> Analysis Algorithm for the Evaluation of Lynch Syndrome Risk in Colorectal Carcinoma Patients: Evidence-Based Data from the Analysis of 100 Consecutive Cases

  • Thais Maloberti,
  • Antonio De Leo,
  • Viviana Sanza,
  • Lidia Merlo,
  • Michela Visani,
  • Giorgia Acquaviva,
  • Sara Coluccelli,
  • Annalisa Altimari,
  • Elisa Gruppioni,
  • Stefano Zagnoni,
  • Daniela Turchetti,
  • Sara Miccoli,
  • Michelangelo Fiorentino,
  • Antonietta D’Errico,
  • Dario de Biase,
  • Giovanni Tallini

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp3030011
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 3
pp. 115 – 124

Abstract

Read online

Several causes may lead to CRC, either extrinsic (sporadic forms) or genetic (hereditary forms), such as Lynch syndrome (LS). Most sporadic deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) CRC cases are characterized by the methylation of the MLH1 promoter gene and/or BRAF gene mutations. Usually, the first test performed is the mismatch repair deficiency analysis. If a tumor shows a dMMR, BRAF mutations and then the MLH1 promoter methylation status have to be assessed, according to the ACG/ASCO screening algorithm. In this study, 100 consecutive formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples of dMMR CRC were analyzed for both BRAF mutations and MLH1 promoter methylation. A total of 47 (47%) samples were BRAF p.V600E mutated, while MLH1 promoter methylation was found in 77 cases (77.0%). The pipeline “BRAF-followed-by-MLH1-analysis” led to a total of 153 tests, while the sequence “MLH1-followed-by-BRAF-analysis” resulted in a total of 123 tests. This study highlights the importance of performing MLH1 analysis in LS screening of BRAF-WT specimens before addressing patients to genetic counseling. We show that MLH1 analysis performs better as a first-line test in the screening of patients with LS risk than first-line BRAF analysis. Our data indicate that analyzing MLH1 methylation as a first-line test is more cost-effective.

Keywords