JGH Open (Sep 2023)

Long‐term safety and effectiveness of azathioprine in the management of inflammatory bowel disease: A real‐world experience

  • Rohan V Yewale,
  • Balakrishnan S Ramakrishna,
  • Babu Vinish Doraisamy,
  • Pandurangan Basumani,
  • Jayanthi Venkataraman,
  • Kayalvizhi Jayaraman,
  • Ananthavadivelu Murali,
  • Karunakaran Premkumar,
  • Akkim Sathish Kumar

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12955
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 9
pp. 599 – 609

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background and Aim Azathioprine (AZA) forms the cornerstone for maintenance of sustained remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). There is apprehension regarding the long‐term effectiveness and safety of AZA in IBD. We present our experience with AZA use and outcomes in a cohort of IBD patients followed up over a long period of time. Methods Records of 507 IBD patients under treatment at a single, tertiary care center in south India between 2013 and 2022 were evaluated retrospectively. Long‐term compliance, tolerance, clinical outcome at the point of last follow‐up, type and duration to the onset of adverse events, and subsequent amendment to treatment with regard to AZA were analyzed. Results Of 507 patients with IBD, 320 patients (207 Crohn's disease [CD], 113 ulcerative colitis [UC]) who received AZA were included. The median follow‐up was 41 months (interquartile range 15.5–77.5). Total duration of exposure was 1359 patient‐years with median usage of 33 months. Of the patients, 26.9% received AZA for >5 years. Mean initiation and maximum doses of AZA were 0.97 and 1.72 mg/kg/day. Among the participants, 20.6% experienced side effects, including myelotoxicity (7.2%) and gastrointestinal intolerance (5.6%). Six patients developed malignancy. Among the side effects, 39.4% of side effects were dose‐dependent. Among the patients, 38.1% had relapses requiring pulse corticosteroid therapy, and 16.2% had more than one relapse after commencement of AZA. AZA was continued till the last follow‐up in 76.5%. Among the patients, 49.7% (UC 51.3, CD 48.8) attained durable remission without biologics, and 5.3% continued to have active disease. Conclusion AZA is safe and effective in the long‐term in IBD. Effectiveness, tolerance, and compliance with AZA are well sustained beyond 5 years of usage and comparable between UC and CD.

Keywords