Frontiers in Oncology (Dec 2021)

Prognostic Value and Outcome for ETV6/RUNX1-Positive Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Report From the South China Children’s Leukemia Group

  • Kun-yin Qiu,
  • Kun-yin Qiu,
  • Hong-gui Xu,
  • Hong-gui Xu,
  • Xue-qun Luo,
  • Hui-rong Mai,
  • Ning Liao,
  • Li-hua Yang,
  • Min-cui Zheng,
  • Wu-qing Wan,
  • Xue-dong Wu,
  • Ri-yang Liu,
  • Qi-wen Chen,
  • Hui-qin Chen,
  • Xiao-fei Sun,
  • Hua Jiang,
  • Xing-jiang Long,
  • Guo-hua Chen,
  • Xin-yu Li,
  • Xin-yu Li,
  • Chang-gang Li,
  • Li-bin Huang,
  • Ya-yun Ling,
  • Dan-na Lin,
  • Chuan Wen,
  • Wen-yong Kuang,
  • Xiao-qin Feng,
  • Zhong-lv Ye,
  • Bei-yan Wu,
  • Xiang-lin He,
  • Qiao-ru Li,
  • Li-na Wang,
  • Xian-ling Kong,
  • Lu-hong Xu,
  • Lu-hong Xu,
  • Chi-kong Li,
  • Jian-pei Fang,
  • Jian-pei Fang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.797194
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

PurposeTo analyzed the outcome of ETV6/RUNX1-positive pediatric acute B lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) with the aim of identifying prognostic value.MethodA total of 2,530 pediatric patients who were diagnosed with B-ALL were classified into two groups based on the ETV6/RUNX1 status by using a retrospective cohort study method from February 28, 2008, to June 30, 2020, at 22 participating ALL centers.ResultsIn total, 461 (18.2%) cases were ETV6/RUNX1-positive. The proportion of patients with risk factors (age <1 year or ≥10 years, WB≥50×109/L) in ETV6/RUNX1-positive group was significantly lower than that in negative group (P<0.001), while the proportion of patients with good early response (good response to prednisone, D15 MRD < 0.1%, and D33 MRD < 0.01%) in ETV6/RUNX1-positive group was higher than that in the negative group (P<0.001, 0.788 and 0.004, respectively). Multivariate analysis of 2,530 patients found that age <1 or ≥10 years, SCCLG-ALL-2016 protocol, and MLL were independent predictor of outcome but not ETV6/RUNX1. The EFS and OS of the ETV6/RUNX1-positive group were significantly higher than those of the negative group (3-year EFS: 90.11 ± 4.21% vs 82 ± 2.36%, P<0.0001, 3-year OS: 91.99 ± 3.92% vs 88.79 ± 1.87%, P=0.017). Subgroup analysis showed that chemotherapy protocol, age, prednisone response, and D15 MRD were important factors affecting the prognosis of ETV6/RUNX1-positive children.ConclusionsETV6/RUNX1-positive pediatric ALL showed an excellent outcome but lack of independent prognostic significance in South China. However, for older patients who have the ETV6/RUNX1 fusion and slow response to therapy, to opt for more intensive treatment.

Keywords