Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia (Dec 1998)

Marcapasso com sensor de contratilidade regulado pelas variações do sistema nervoso autônomo na miocardiopatia chagásica crônica Chagas heart disease and contractility rate responsive pacing controlled by autonomic nervous system variations

  • Oswaldo Tadeu Greco,
  • Roberto Vito Ardito,
  • Dorotéia Rossi Silva Souza,
  • Max Schaldach

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X1998001200004
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 71, no. 6
pp. 751 – 761

Abstract

Read online

OBJETIVO: Analisar o desempenho da estimulação cardíaca artificial com marcapasso do tipo VVIR cujo sensor é regulado pelas variações do sistema nervoso autônomo em pacientes chagásicos com distúrbio no sistema de condução. MÉTODOS: Estudados 47 chagásicos, 28 do sexo masculino, com idades entre 24 e 68 anos, 36 tinham bloqueio atrioventricular (AV) total; 8, bloqueio AV de 2º grau 2; e 3 doença do nódulo sinusal, e encontravam-se, de acordo com a NYHA, em classe I (4), II (15), III (16) e IV (12). Após o implante de marcapasso do tipo VVIR os pacientes foram acompanhados durante 12 meses. A resposta de freqüência foi registrada em gravações de Holter de 24h e divididos em dois grupos de acordo com a FC em repouso - grupo 1: >65bpm e grupo 2: PURPOSE: To analyse the performance of the artificial cardiac stimulation with the VVIR pacemaker whose sensor is adjusted by the variations of the autonomic nervous system in Chagas disease patients with deficiency of the conduction system. METHODS: Forty-seven Chagas disease patients have been studied, 28 male between 24 and 68 years old, 36 patients had complete AV block, 8 had 2nd degree AV block and the other 3 had sinus node disease. The patients were in class I (4), II (15), III (16) and IV (12) according to the NYHA. A 12-month-follow-up with constant clinical evaluations was carried out after pacemaker implantation. Patients were divided in 2 different groups according to the HR at rest - group 1: >65 beats per minute (bpm) and group 2: <=65bpm, for a comparative study considering: 1) HR at stress test after the implantation; 2) arterial blood pressure at rest after the implantation and, 3) evaluation of the identified electrodes such as TIR-60-UP and others. RESULTS: The group 1 had greater HR at rest, and a smaller variation of values at stress than group 2. This shows that with this type of stimulation system it is possible to control each patient separately. The values of blood pressure at rest and during stress were not different between groups. According to the factors analysed the TIR-60-UP electrode had the same performance as the others. CONCLUSION: The VVIR pacemaker with the sensor adjusted by the ANS variations has provided the Chagas patients with a restoration of their physiological mechanisms. 74% of them had the improvement of either one or 2 functional classes.

Keywords