Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (Apr 2024)

Experimental evaluation of the impact of sEMG interfaces in enhancing embodiment of virtual myoelectric prostheses

  • Theophil Spiegeler Castañeda,
  • Mathilde Connan,
  • Patricia Capsi-Morales,
  • Philipp Beckerle,
  • Claudio Castellini,
  • Cristina Piazza

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-024-01352-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 21, no. 1
pp. 1 – 16

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Introduction Despite recent technological advances that have led to sophisticated bionic prostheses, attaining embodied solutions still remains a challenge. Recently, the investigation of prosthetic embodiment has become a topic of interest in the research community, which deals with enhancing the perception of artificial limbs as part of users’ own body. Surface electromyography (sEMG) interfaces have emerged as a promising technology for enhancing upper-limb prosthetic control. However, little is known about the impact of these sEMG interfaces on users’ experience regarding embodiment and their interaction with different functional levels. Methods To investigate this aspect, a comparison is conducted among sEMG configurations with different number of sensors (4 and 16 channels) and different time delay. We used a regression algorithm to simultaneously control hand closing/opening and forearm pronation/supination in an immersive virtual reality environment. The experimental evaluation includes 24 able-bodied subjects and one prosthesis user. We assess functionality with the Target Achievement Control test, and the sense of embodiment with a metric for the users perception of self-location, together with a standard survey. Results Among the four tested conditions, results proved a higher subjective embodiment when participants used sEMG interfaces employing an increased number of sensors. Regarding functionality, significant improvement over time is observed in the same conditions, independently of the time delay implemented. Conclusions Our work indicates that a sufficient number of sEMG sensors improves both, functional and subjective embodiment outcomes. This prompts discussion regarding the potential relationship between these two aspects present in bionic integration. Similar embodiment outcomes are observed in the prosthesis user, showing also differences due to the time delay, and demonstrating the influence of sEMG interfaces on the sense of agency.

Keywords