BMC Medical Imaging (Oct 2024)

Clinic, CT radiomics, and deep learning combined model for the prediction of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis

  • Kaixiang Zhang,
  • Guoxin Zhao,
  • Yinghui Liu,
  • Yongbin Huang,
  • Jie Long,
  • Ning Li,
  • Huangze Yan,
  • Xiuzhu Zhang,
  • Jingzhi Ma,
  • Yuming Zhang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01442-x
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is a serious fungal infection. However, current diagnostic methods have limitations. The purpose of this study was to use artificial intelligence to achieve a more accurate diagnosis of IPA. Methods Totally 263 patients (148 cases of IPA, 115 cases of non-IPA) were retrospectively enrolled from a single institution and randomly divided into training and test sets at a ratio of 7:3. Clinic-radiological independent risk factors for IPA were screened using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis, after which a clinic-radiological model was constructed. The optimal radiomics features were extracted and screened based on CT images to construct the radiomics label score (Rad-score) and radiomics model. The optimal DL features were extracted and screened using four pre-trained convolutional neural networks, respectively, followed by the construction of the DL label score (DL-score) and DL model. Then, the radiomics-DL model was constructed. Finally, the combined model was constructed based on clinic-radiological independent risk factors, the Rad-score, and the DL-score. LR was adopted as the classifier. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn, and the areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the efficacy of each model in predicting IPA. Additionally, based on the best-performing model on the LR classifier, four other machine learning (ML) classifiers were constructed to evaluate the predictive value for IPA. Results The AUC of the clinic-radiological model for predicting IPA in the training and test sets was 0.845 and 0.765, respectively. The AUC of the radiomics-DL and combined models in the training set was 0.871 and 0.932, while in the test set was 0.851 and 0.881, respectively. The combined model showed better predictive performance than all other models. DCA showed that taking 0.00–1.00 as the threshold, the clinical benefit of the combined model was higher than that of all other models. Then, the combined model was trained on four other machine learning classifiers, all of which achieved AUC values above 0.80 in the test set, showing good performance in predicting IPA. Conclusion Clinic, CT radiomics, and DL combined model could be used to predict IPA effectively.

Keywords