Diagnostics (Feb 2020)

Accuracy in Referrals to Gynecologic Oncologists Based on Clinical Presentation for Ovarian Mass

  • Katherine Jane C. Chua,
  • Ricky D. Patel,
  • Radhika Trivedi,
  • Patricia Greenberg,
  • Kyle Beiter,
  • Thomas Magliaro,
  • Ushma Patel,
  • Joyce Varughese

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10020106
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 10, no. 2
p. 106

Abstract

Read online

Ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal gynecological cancers in women due to late diagnosis. Despite technological advancements, experienced physicians have high sensitivities and specificities in subjective assessments when combining ultrasound findings and clinical history in analyzing adnexal masses. This study aims to demonstrate general obstetricians and gynecologists’ (OB/GYN) appropriateness in gynecologic oncologist referrals for malignant ovarian masses based on history and physical (H&P), imaging, and available tumor markers. Three board certified OB/GYNs were given 148 cases and determined whether or not they would refer them to a gynecologic oncologist. Results showed that OB/GYNs were 81−85% accurate in diagnosing patients with a benign or malignant disease. Among the malignant cases, reviewers had a high sensitivity ranging from 74−81% in appropriately referring a malignancy. In our study, OB/GYNs referred between 23−32% of ovarian masses to a gynecologic oncologist with only 9.5% of cases found to be malignant. Despite the high referral rates, generalists showed a high degree of sensitivity in accurately referring malignant diseases based solely on clinical experience and imaging studies, which could improve survival rates with early intervention by gynecologic oncologists.

Keywords