International Journal of Women's Health (Mar 2024)
Barriers Associated with Adherence to Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women Living with HIV in Nkhatabay District, Malawi: A Mixed-Methods Study
Abstract
Phyllis Chinsamba Baluwa,1,2 Reuben Christopher Moyo,2 Masumbuko Albert Baluwa,3 Lot Nyirenda1 1School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi; 2Nkhatabay District Hospital, Nkhatabay Council, Nkhatabay, Malawi; 3Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Mzuzu University, Mzuzu, MalawiCorrespondence: Phyllis Chinsamba Baluwa, School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Private Bag 360, Blantyre, Malawi, Tel +265999353175, Email [email protected]: Cervical cancer (CC) incidence among Women Living with HIV (WLHIV) is high compared to the general population of women. As such, the Malawi National CC guideline recommends yearly screening among WLHIV. However, only 15.9% of WLHIV were screened nationally using Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) by 2015 and there is no data regarding adherence and barriers to yearly screening. This study assessed adherence levels and associated barriers to yearly Cervical Cancer screening (CCS) among WLHIV.Methods: A cross-sectional concurrent mixed-method study was conducted at Nkhatabay District Hospital (NBDH) and Chintheche Rural Hospital (CRH) in Malawi. A sample of 205 WLHIV participated in quantitative strand and in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 health care workers and 10 WLHIV. Quantitative data were analysed using STATA version 16. Pearson’s chi-square test and Multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed. P value was set at 0.05. Qualitative data were analysed deductively following six steps of thematic analysis.Results: Only 5.4% (n=11) of the participants had been screened as required. Women aged ≥ 45 had 4 times the odds of being screened for CC compared to ≤ 30 (OR 4.18, 95% CI 0.65– 26.8). WLHIV on ART > 10 years had more than 5 times the odds of being screened (OR 5.9, 95% CI 1.08– 33.19) compared with those on ART < 3 years. Use of male service providers (p =< 0.001), fear of the VIA procedure (p = < 0.001) and lack of interest (p = < 0.015) were significant barriers to adherence. Qualitative findings revealed a lack of knowledge regarding CCS protocol and the use of male providers.Conclusion: WLHIV face many challenges in accessing CCS and adherence to yearly CCS is very low. There is urgent need for targeted community awareness, scaling up of HPV tests and incorporation of CCS into routine integrated outreach services.Keywords: women living with HIV, cervical cancer screening, barriers, adherence
