Advances in Medical Education and Practice (Jan 2022)
The Prevalence of Stress Among Medical Students Studying an Integrative Curriculum During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Abstract
Ihab Shafek Atta,1,2 Abdullah Almilaibary3 1Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assuit, Egypt; 2Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Albaha University, Albaha, Saudi Arabia; 3Family and Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Albaha University, Albaha, Al-Aqiq, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Ihab Shafek AttaPathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Assuit, EgyptTel +966506651017Email [email protected] AlmilaibaryFamily and Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Albaha University, Albaha, Al-Aqiq, Saudi ArabiaTel +966554513138Email [email protected]: Stress is a psychological shift that negatively affects student achievement. We sought to investigate the extent of stress in the medical students at our university.Patients and Methods: A total of 337 medical students representing three program phases were represented. Stress was measured using a questionnaire divided into three main parts: 10-question Kessler instruments, 10-questions specific to identifying the causes of stress, and a qualitative component to report additional information. For the Kessler questionnaire, a score of less than 20 was considered negative for stress of any level (alert) and scores of 20– 24 were considered mild stress (resistance phase), 25– 29 moderate stress (near exhaustion), and 30– 50 severe stress (exhaustion). Descriptive studies in the form of mean, standard deviation, and confidence interval (CI) were used in addition to the chi-squared test for estimate significant differences between variables. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.Results: The prevalence of stress was 85.5%, with a slight male predominance. The prevalence of stress was seen among the male students during Phase I (88.25%), followed by male students during Phase III (87.7%), female students during phase II (86.5%), male students during phase II (84.5%), female students during phase I (83.3%) and female students during phase III (80.4%). Stress was uniformly high during phase I (86.2%) followed by phase II (85.4%) and phase III (85.1%), and 85% of stress was obtained from the number and content of assessments.Conclusion: There is a high level of stress throughout the curriculum. The number of assessments and the number of modules and their content are the primary sources of stress. Student mentorship, including academic, psychic, and social counseling, may help predict and manage stress and improve student performance. Detection of stress among the students is a major issue for program monitoring and development.Keywords: academic performance, COVID-19, integrated curriculum, stress
