Frontiers in Physics (Sep 2023)

Comprehensive deep learning-based framework for automatic organs-at-risk segmentation in head-and-neck and pelvis for MR-guided radiation therapy planning

  • Vanda Czipczer,
  • Bernadett Kolozsvári,
  • Borbála Deák-Karancsi,
  • Marta E. Capala,
  • Rachel A. Pearson,
  • Emőke Borzási,
  • Zsófia Együd,
  • Szilvia Gaál,
  • Gyöngyi Kelemen,
  • Renáta Kószó,
  • Viktor Paczona,
  • Zoltán Végváry,
  • Zsófia Karancsi,
  • Ádám Kékesi,
  • Edina Czunyi,
  • Blanka H. Irmai,
  • Nóra G. Keresnyei,
  • Petra Nagypál,
  • Renáta Czabány,
  • Bence Gyalai,
  • Bulcsú P. Tass,
  • Balázs Cziria,
  • Cristina Cozzini,
  • Lloyd Estkowsky,
  • Lehel Ferenczi,
  • András Frontó,
  • Ross Maxwell,
  • István Megyeri,
  • Michael Mian,
  • Tao Tan,
  • Jonathan Wyatt,
  • Florian Wiesinger,
  • Katalin Hideghéty,
  • Hazel McCallum,
  • Steven F. Petit,
  • László Ruskó

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1236792
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11

Abstract

Read online

Introduction: The excellent soft-tissue contrast of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is appealing for delineation of organs-at-risk (OARs) as it is required for radiation therapy planning (RTP). In the last decade there has been an increasing interest in using deep-learning (DL) techniques to shorten the labor-intensive manual work and increase reproducibility. This paper focuses on the automatic segmentation of 27 head-and-neck and 10 male pelvis OARs with deep-learning methods based on T2-weighted MR images.Method: The proposed method uses 2D U-Nets for localization and 3D U-Net for segmentation of the various structures. The models were trained using public and private datasets and evaluated on private datasets only.Results and discussion: Evaluation with ground-truth contours demonstrated that the proposed method can accurately segment the majority of OARs and indicated similar or superior performance to state-of-the-art models. Furthermore, the auto-contours were visually rated by clinicians using Likert score and on average, 81% of them was found clinically acceptable.

Keywords