Current Oncology (Oct 2022)

Cancer Patients First Treated with Chemotherapy: Are They More Likely to Receive Surgery in the Pandemic?

  • Rui Fu,
  • Rinku Sutradhar,
  • Anna Dare,
  • Qing Li,
  • Timothy P. Hanna,
  • Kelvin K. W. Chan,
  • Jonathan C. Irish,
  • Natalie Coburn,
  • Julie Hallet,
  • Simron Singh,
  • Ambica Parmar,
  • Craig C. Earle,
  • Lauren Lapointe-Shaw,
  • Monika K. Krzyzanowska,
  • Antonio Finelli,
  • Alexander V. Louie,
  • Ian J. Witterick,
  • Alyson Mahar,
  • David R. Urbach,
  • Daniel I. McIsaac,
  • Danny Enepekides,
  • Nicole J. Look Hong,
  • Antoine Eskander

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29100611
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 29, no. 10
pp. 7732 – 7744

Abstract

Read online

Due to the ramping down of cancer surgery in early pandemic, many newly diagnosed patients received other treatments first. We aimed to quantify the pandemic-related shift in rate of surgery following chemotherapy. This is a retrospective population-based cohort study involving adults diagnosed with cancer between 3 January 2016 and 7 November 2020 in Ontario, Canada who received chemotherapy as first treatment within 6-months of diagnosis. Competing-risks regression models with interaction effects were used to quantify the association between COVID-19 period (receiving a cancer diagnosis before or on/after 15 March 2020) and receipt of surgical reSection 9-months after first chemotherapy. Among 51,653 patients, 8.5% (n = 19,558) of them ultimately underwent surgery 9-months after chemotherapy initiation. Receipt of surgery was higher during the pandemic than before (sHR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02–1.13). Material deprivation was independently associated with lower receipt of surgery (least vs. most deprived quintile: sHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04–1.17), but did not change with the pandemic. The surgical rate increase was most pronounced for breast cancer (sHR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06–1.20). These pandemic-related shifts in cancer treatment requires further evaluations to understand the long-term consequences. Persistent material deprivation-related inequity in cancer surgical access needs to be addressed.

Keywords