Validity of specific CPT indices in differentiating school-aged children previously diagnosed with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder from school-aged children with non-attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in general education classrooms: a case control study

Abstract

Abstract Background Continuous performance tests (CPTs) are a popular tool for evaluating the symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Performance measurements are typically linked to the biological features and cognitive functions of individuals. To determine the validity of specific CPT indices in differentiating between school-aged children with ADHD from with non-ADHD, each student’s sex, chronological age, and cognitive abilities should be considered. Methods In this prospective case–control study, a total of 30 non-ADHD students and 26 with ADHD who were aged 6 to 12 years were from general education classrooms. All students completed the Continuous Performance Tests (CPTs) and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-revised (Mandarin-Chinese version). Demographic data were collected from the students’ parents. Results Detectability, Omissions, Commissions, and Hit Reaction Time Standard Deviation (HRT SD) yielded higher T-scores in children with ADHD than those without. Compared with non-ADHD students, those with ADHD had higher classification scores for Detectability, Omissions, Perseverations, and HRT SD. For each CPT index, after individual factors were controlled for, logistic regression revealed that only students with positive scores for Detectability, Omission, and HRT SD (adjusted odds ratios = 4.627, 9.977, and 3.908, Ps < 0.05) were likely to receive a diagnosis of ADHD. Furthermore, after individual characteristics were controlled for, Logistic regression also revealed that the cumulative positive scores of the Detectability, Omission, or and HRT SD remained associated with an increased risk of ADHD (adjusted odds ratio = 3.116, P < 0.01). Conclusions Compared with school-aged children with non-ADHD in general education classrooms, those with ADHD exhibited significantly lower performance in inattention-related CPT indices. To reach an accurate diagnosis through CPTs, clinicians should pay attention to Detectability, Omission, and HRT SD. Compared with other CPT indices, Detectability, Omission, and HRT SD may function as more suitable indicators for distinguishing between school-aged children with and non-ADHD in general education classrooms. These indicators are robust and unobscured by individual characteristics.

Keywords

• Continuous performance test
• Embedded validity
• Inattentiveness
• Clinical utility
• General education classroom