Usefulness of preoperative venography in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices submitted to lead replacement or device upgrade procedures

Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia. 2018;(0) DOI 10.5935/abc.20180164


Journal Homepage

Journal Title: Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia

ISSN: 0066-782X (Print); 1678-4170 (Online)

Publisher: Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia (SBC)

Society/Institution: Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia

LCC Subject Category: Medicine: Internal medicine: Specialties of internal medicine: Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system

Country of publisher: Brazil

Language of fulltext: English, Portuguese

Full-text formats available: PDF, HTML, XML



Caio Marcos de Moraes Albertini
Katia Regina da Silva
Joaquim MaurĂ­cio da Motta Leal Filho
Elizabeth Sartori Crevelari
Martino Martinelli Filho
Francisco Cesar Carnevale
Roberto Costa


Peer review

Editorial Board

Instructions for authors

Time From Submission to Publication: 10 weeks


Abstract | Full Text

Abstract Background: Venous obstructions are common in patients with transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices, but they rarely cause immediate clinical problems. The main consequence of these lesions is the difficulty in obtaining venous access for additional leads implantation. Objectives: We aimed to assess the prevalence and predictor factors of venous lesions in patients referred to lead reoperations, and to define the role of preoperative venography in the planning of these procedures. Methods: From April 2013 to July 2016, contrast venography was performed in 100 patients referred to device upgrade, revision and lead extraction. Venous lesions were classified as non-significant (< 50%), moderate stenosis (51-70%), severe stenosis (71-99%) or occlusion (100%). Collateral circulation was classified as absent, discrete, moderate or accentuated. The surgical strategy was defined according to the result of the preoperative venography. Univariate analysis was used to investigate predictor factors related to the occurrence of these lesions, with 5% of significance level. Results: Moderate venous stenosis was observed in 23%, severe in 13% and occlusions in 11%. There were no significant differences in relation to the device side or the venous segment. The usefulness of the preoperative venography to define the operative tactic was proven, and in 99% of the cases, the established surgical strategy could be performed according to plan. Conclusions: The prevalence of venous obstruction is high in CIED recipients referred to reoperations. Venography is highly indicated as a preoperative examination for allowing the adequate surgical planning of procedures involving previous transvenous leads.