Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (Jul 2022)

Through Thick and Thin: Baseline Cortical Volume and Thickness Predict Performance and Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia

  • Nicole R. Nissim,
  • Nicole R. Nissim,
  • Denise Y. Harvey,
  • Christopher Haslam,
  • Leah Friedman,
  • Pandurang Bharne,
  • Pandurang Bharne,
  • Geneva Litz,
  • Geneva Litz,
  • Jeffrey S. Phillips,
  • Jeffrey S. Phillips,
  • Katheryn A. Q. Cousins,
  • Katheryn A. Q. Cousins,
  • Sharon X. Xie,
  • Murray Grossman,
  • Murray Grossman,
  • Roy H. Hamilton

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.907425
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16

Abstract

Read online

ObjectivesWe hypothesized that measures of cortical thickness and volume in language areas would correlate with response to treatment with high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) in persons with primary progressive aphasia (PPA).Materials and MethodsIn a blinded, within-group crossover study, PPA patients (N = 12) underwent a 2-week intervention HD-tDCS paired with constraint-induced language therapy (CILT). Multi-level linear regression (backward-fitted models) were performed to assess cortical measures as predictors of tDCS-induced naming improvements, measured by the Western Aphasia Battery-naming subtest, from baseline to immediately after and 6 weeks post-intervention.ResultsGreater baseline thickness of the pars opercularis significantly predicted naming gains (p = 0.03) immediately following intervention, while greater thickness of the middle temporal gyrus (MTG) and lower thickness of the superior temporal gyrus (STG) significantly predicted 6-week naming gains (p’s < 0.02). Thickness did not predict naming gains in sham. Volume did not predict immediate gains for active stimulation. Greater volume of the pars triangularis and MTG, but lower STG volume significantly predicted 6-week naming gains in active stimulation. Greater pars orbitalis and MTG volume, and lower STG volume predicted immediate naming gains in sham (p’s < 0.05). Volume did not predict 6-week naming gains in sham.ConclusionCortical thickness and volume were predictive of tDCS-induced naming improvement in PPA patients. The finding that frontal thickness predicted immediate active tDCS-induced naming gains while temporal areas predicted naming changes at 6-week suggests that a broader network of regions may be important for long-term maintenance of treatment gains. The finding that volume predicted immediate naming performance in the sham condition may reflect the benefits of behavioral speech language therapy and neural correlates of its short-lived treatment gains. Collectively, thickness and volume were predictive of treatment gains in the active condition but not sham, suggesting that pairing HD-tDCS with CILT may be important for maintaining treatment effects.

Keywords