Critique of the jurisprudential principles of Article 250 of the Civil Code

Abstract

According to Article 72 of the Constitution, the contradiction of the laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran with the principles and rules ofthe official religion of the country has been denied and the jurists of the Guardian Council are also obliged to protect this important issue. From this point of view, considering the disputes that can be seen in the jurisprudential documents of Article 250 of the Civil Code, its study has a special necessity. According to the mentioned article, the condition for the effect of permission in a usurious contract is that it is not prior to rejection. However, the documents of this promise, which is in fact the famous jurisprudential promise in this discussion, including consensus, the decline of the title of the contract, the rule of domination and the principle of istihaab, are disputed and discussed. On the other hand, the Sahih of Muhammad ibn Qays is a compelling reason for another saying, that is, the effect of prior permission to reject; Therefore, according to the studies conducted in this issue, it seems that it will be necessary to amend and revise the mentioned article.

Keywords

• article 250 of the civil code
• prying contract
• prior permission to refuse