ERJ Open Research (Aug 2017)

Protected sampling is preferable in bronchoscopic studies of the airway microbiome

  • Rune Grønseth,
  • Christine Drengenes,
  • Harald G. Wiker,
  • Solveig Tangedal,
  • Yaxin Xue,
  • Gunnar Reksten Husebø,
  • Øistein Svanes,
  • Sverre Lehmann,
  • Marit Aardal,
  • Tuyen Hoang,
  • Tharmini Kalananthan,
  • Einar Marius Hjellestad Martinsen,
  • Elise Orvedal Leiten,
  • Marianne Aanerud,
  • Eli Nordeide,
  • Ingvild Haaland,
  • Inge Jonassen,
  • Per Bakke,
  • Tomas Eagan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00019-2017
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 3

Abstract

Read online

The aim was to evaluate susceptibility of oropharyngeal contamination with various bronchoscopic sampling techniques. 67 patients with obstructive lung disease and 58 control subjects underwent bronchoscopy with small-volume lavage (SVL) through the working channel, protected bronchoalveolar lavage (PBAL) and bilateral protected specimen brush (PSB) sampling. Subjects also provided an oral wash (OW) sample, and negative control samples were gathered for each bronchoscopy procedure. DNA encoding bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA was sequenced and bioinformatically processed to cluster into operational taxonomic units (OTU), assign taxonomy and obtain measures of diversity. The proportion of Proteobacteria increased, whereas Firmicutes diminished in the order OW, SVL, PBAL, PSB (p<0.01). The alpha-diversity decreased in the same order (p<0.01). Also, beta-diversity varied by sampling method (p<0.01), and visualisation of principal coordinates analyses indicated that differences in diversity were smaller between OW and SVL and OW and PBAL samples than for OW and the PSB samples. The order of sampling (left versus right first) did not influence alpha- or beta-diversity for PSB samples. Studies of the airway microbiota need to address the potential for oropharyngeal contamination, and protected sampling might represent an acceptable measure to minimise this problem.